Lantz, A.: Intervjumetodik – Den professionellt genomförda intervjun (in Swedish). Studentlitteratur. () 6. Abrahamsen, P.: Samarbete, samverkan, samvaro. Kvale, Steinar Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Studentlitteratur, Lund. Lantz, Annika Intervjumetodik. Studentlitteratur, Lund. Marander-Eklund. Author: Lantz, Annika, Publication year: Language: Swedish. Media class: Book. Publisher: W&W,. ISBN:
|Published (Last):||11 February 2018|
|PDF File Size:||16.67 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Research methods in HCI, formdi09
The aim of the intervjumeyodik is to explore job design practices that enhance team proactivity within a lean production system where autonomy is uttermost restricted.
We start this chapter by describing positive outcomes of teamwork for the individual, the team and the organization. It updates the research agenda, which is most topical during the financial crisis and economic restructuring of today.
Journal of Workplace Learning 27 1 November 20, Bookmark and share Tell a friend. The anthology is of a multidisciplinary character and its articles evaluate the contributions of various projects, programmes and standard public services for persons at risk of labour market exclusion. Learning at the workplace is essential for long-term employability, and for job satisfaction and health.
Standardized tasks, regardless of cognitive demand, do not impact team learning processes or proactivity. The results presented in this paper are based on two studies, part of a larger longitudinal project on teamwork on the shop-floor within LPS in manufacturing industry.
International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations 3 2 Supportive leadership has an effect on group processes that in turn impact group initiative and self-organizational activities and a direct effect on group initiative as well.
Very few studies have investigated the paradox between lean and teamwork, yet many lean-inspired productions systems have teamwork as a pillar for enhancing effectiveness. Results are based on a cross-sectional study and cannot be interpreted causally yet. Chapter Leaned teamwork fattens workplace innovation.
How do we want to work tomorrow? Ibtervjumetodik aim is to contribute to research on workplace innovation by identifying tasks within industrial Lean Production Systems LPS that can trigger the involvement of teams in workplace innovation. A conclusion was that teamwork within LPS can be a pillar for innovation, and enhance learning, inhervjumetodik additional tasks are identified and carried out. How can effects of teamwork be explained and thus be interfjumetodik
We hypothesize that job design parameters team participation in decision making regarding job routines, participative leadership style, cross-functional cooperation enhance team proactivity via team learning building shared meaning as a mediator.
In the second study we investigate qualitative differences between how close-to the-production specialists describe their CBC with stagnant teams 1 SD below mean on team intervhumetodik in study 1 and proactive teams 1 SD above mean in study 1and how managers support and engage intervvjumetodik CBC.
2D [NADA, KTH], [HMI] latest information
Continuous improvement, on the other hand, relies on teams that are proactive. Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Annika Lantz, Kin Andersson. This book addresses the links between unemployment, precariousness work and health risks ingervjumetodik various scientific frames of reference as well as those of policy-makers.
Mediation analysis on aggregated data a consisting of 41 teams showed that cognitive demand in the most demanding task in the non-standardized work was fully mediated by team learning processes on proactivity and that inter-team collaboration was mediated by team-learning processes on proactivity.
In this paper our aim is to investigate the role of cross-boundary collaboration CBC for team learning and proactivity, and identify hindrances and prerequisites for such collaboration. Within the production all tasks that go beyond the production when it runs well, involve other functions.
Intervjumetodik – Annika Lantz – Google Books
Participation in forming the standardization of work is linked to managerial style, which can be changed and developed also within a lean concept. Chapter Why Are We in a Team?
Lean production System LPS has been widely implemented in organizations in different sectors all over the world Wittrock, The authors range from major classics in the field to newcomers from several countries presenting their research results. Postal address Psykologiska institutionen 91 Stockholm. An Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology, In this study, we explored relations between task complexity, team learning, and team innovation processes.
Research methods in Human-Computer Interaction (2D5339, HMI 651), Fall 2000
LPS principles short work flows, focus on value-stream, standardization, and routinization limit autonomy and complexity, and are opposed to a job design that supports individual- and team learning see e. Based on our experiences of implementing the results in the production plant, we discuss what it takes to create and manage participative intervju,etodik and close collaboration between teams on the shop floor, and other stakeholders such as production support, based on a shared understanding of the work and work processes.
Lean production and team-work are based on seemingly opposing principles of job design, and yet often combined in production systems within industry. Conference Cross-boundary collaboration and team innovation.
How can such proactive behavior be supported? In the following sections, we first outline a model of effective teamwork and then go deeper into aspects and processes that research has shown to be important for team effectiveness. Work task analysis was conducted at baseline among 41 teams to capture the complexity of different work tasks. Our conclusion is that teams within LPS can be engaged in workplace innovation depending on how they take on additional tasks, as these lxntz team learning.
We finish with an overview of the main findings and discuss how contextual and inetrvjumetodik aspects impact team processes, and how factors on individual, team and organizational levels interact.
The authors include also representatives of several international organizations.